On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:59:55 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
> wrote:

>On Jul 22, 8:30*am, blake murphy > wrote:
>>
<snip>
>> > One could
>> > omit the original poster's sig, but leaving it in (At least the name.
>> > Other parts of the sig can be snipped) is a reminder to anyone else
>> > reading it who was being answered. *The replying poster's sig is
>> > automatically tacked onto the end by newsreaders. *Since I use
>> > GoogleGroups, I have to add it manually. *Again, at the very end.
>>
>> why? *anyone can tell from the beginning of the message who you are
>> replying to. *you mean to tell me you *make a special effort* to include
>> the original poster's name after your reply? *how foolish.
>
>Not deleting doesn't require special effort.
<snip
>
>Oh, and if you had read carefully you'd have seen that it was MY sig
>that I had to add manually because of using a web-based newsreader.
>>
>> blake
>
>--Bryan

I still don't understand why you won't keep his signature under his
own text instead of making it appear under your text.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.