sf wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:47:48 -0700, "Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq."
> > wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Dora wrote:
>>
>>>Please stop responding to trolls on ukf+dm. You're making a bad
>>>situation worse. Thanks.
>>
>>*Chuckle* Talk about ****ing in the wind!
>>
>>If you cant or wont use your mail filters don't whine about public
>>access forums being public access forums.
>>
>>There's enough snobs in "ukf+dm" to make up your own moderated group.
>>have at it and you can all wallow in your own smug, self satisfied
>>xenophobia without being bothered by all those nasty, unauthorized
>>OPINIONS you all seem to hate so terribly much.
>
>
> Joseph, ukf+dm is almost overwhelmed... they don't have ordinary
> trolls, they have people who impersonate others (think of the PL
> situation only more regulars are involved and to their credit, they
> try not to fan the flames). I know only because I've made it a point
> to read ukf+dm daily for the past week and it's a minefield of
> imposters. Think of the bombing of London. Their trolls give no
> consideration to the consequences of their actions and act in a truly
> antisocial manner. You have to read ukf+dm daily to understand.
> I think more rfc posters should read ukf+dm and figure out who is and
> isn't who.
>

Is my netscape browser just that efficient? it is so very easy to excise
the rudely obnoxious types that i just don't understand what the fuss is
about.

Even Mz. Hughes can be discerned rather easily from her header's all
though the impersonators did give me a bit of a confusing time for a day
or 2.
--

Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq.

Domine, dirige nos.
Let the games begin!
http://fredeeky.typepad.com/fredeeky.../sf_anthem.mp3