NO LAWN MOWING TODAY
> wrote in message
...
>
> "%" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Alexander Kalinowski" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>% wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" > wrote in
>>>>>>>> message ...
>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> message ...
>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> message ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" > wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in message ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" > wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in message ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Requiscant In Pace" > wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 7, 8:34 am, Alexander Kalinowski
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > "%" > wrote in news:naSdndX73JPV_-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> the grass is too wet from all the rain ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> yay , yahoo , woopee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I don't have a lawn, but if I did, I'd let you help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > mow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take it to email.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, seven times in row, you just posted "take it to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is that using less time, energy and bandwith? In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response to what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you consider flooding by all these other guys, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flood the group in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he's a self fulfilling prophet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No no. You've been posting like you're trying break
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doug's all-time posting record. You stated repeatedly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that my posts only help increase
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your post count.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My job is only to make sure that you don't achieve that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without being told repeatedly what to make of that. And
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am achieving that. :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and i'm achieving what i said so aren't we the little
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> achievers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What good does it do though? :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it seems to bring joy and stimulation to some people here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No problem with that *until* your trying to break posting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> records starts and the noise this creates has a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-productive effect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me an example of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You want me to show you a poster who never posted because of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it? :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seriously?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you rather state your view on what effect it might
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have, hmm?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> i don't have a view to share
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>> Because you know they won't hold up under scrutiny.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Pretty cowardly, no? :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So much for being a 'winner'... <g>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> well go ahead and scrutinize my non view then ,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>> Your actions and words will reveal your "non"-view. Can't escape
>>>>>>>>> that one. :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> now that i have you resorting to name calling
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>> Why would I refrain from calling an act of cowardice an act of
>>>>>>>>> cowardice?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i don't know and i didn't ask
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>> Then I didn't resort to name-calling either. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i don't care if you did or not
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex:
>>>>> ...you'll claim I did either way, I know. Thus my calling you out on
>>>>> your spin-doctoring.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i'll never call you so wrong a roonie
>>>
>>> Alex:
>>> You accused me falsely of name-calling. That stands. :-)
>>
>>
>> show me me doing that
>
>
> Gimme gimme gimme that thing
>
i'm going to the big town , yay
|