cybercat wrote:

> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:27:03 -0400, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:28:21 -0700, Terry Pulliam Burd wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:51:17 -0700, sf > fired up
>>>> random neurons and synapses to opine:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:23:35 -0700, Terry Pulliam Burd
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> And my original post referenced the LA city council contemplating
>>>>>> mandatory locks on recycling bins
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm. There's another clue for you that it's stealing.
>>>>
>>>> LA city council records indicate the measure was to keep the
>>>> homeless out of residential neighborhoods.
>>>
>>> bingo.
>>>
>> Bullshit.
>>
> It's true. In the same way the City of Raleigh removed benches from
> the downtown park adjoining upscale retail, allegedly "for repairs."
> Last I checked it had been five years and the "repairs" had not been
> done. The shelter is a block away.

Smart move. The homeless hog up all the benches, tear them apart, etc. So
no normal person would want to sit on the benches or even be *near* them...

Anyways, if the homeless want to sit or recline they in this particular case
can go to the homeless shelter - right...???

Here in Chicawgo benches have a barrier in the middle so the homeless can't
stretch out and sleep on them...

It's obvious that you are ignernt of the vagaries of modern urban life,
cyberkitty...


--
Best
Gregory Morrow