On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:34:35 -0700, sf > wrote:

-->On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:08:17 -0500, Chemiker
> wrote:
-->
-->>Seriously, I don't know that there IS an answer.
-->
-->I've read here when people say "turn off" whatever it is they
-->recommended and the poster they were talking to said it worked. I
-->dunno. I don't have Vista... yet. Hopefully, I'll skip it and go
-->directly to the next generation. I skipped from 3.11 to XP, so it's
-->possible.
-->
-->I remember when people complained about XP, so it's all relative. LOL


I find XP very stable, was a beta tester for Win95 and 2000, they were OK after
we got all the bugs out. I will not go near Vista, two gigs of ram just for the
OS to run properly good god. If you're running Vista upgrade your ram to four
gigs.
If I go anywhere it will be to System 7, from what I've been told by a few who
are building third party app's for it, that it is unbelievably user friendly.

Wonder if Mickysoft has finally learned their lesson, not to put out an OS
prematurely that needs patches to fix bugs for the next two years?