On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:55:27 -0500, Madame Ovary wrote:

> cybercat wrote:
>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:27:03 -0400, blake murphy
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:28:21 -0700, Terry Pulliam Burd wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:51:17 -0700, sf > fired up
>>>>> random neurons and synapses to opine:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:23:35 -0700, Terry Pulliam Burd
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And my original post referenced the LA city council contemplating
>>>>>>> mandatory locks on recycling bins
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmm. There's another clue for you that it's stealing.
>>>>>
>>>>> LA city council records indicate the measure was to keep the
>>>>> homeless out of residential neighborhoods.
>>>>
>>>> bingo.
>>>>
>>> Bullshit.
>>>
>> It's true. In the same way the City of Raleigh removed benches from
>> the downtown park adjoining upscale retail, allegedly "for repairs."
>> Last I checked it had been five years and the "repairs" had not been
>> done. The shelter is a block away.
>
> Smart move. The homeless hog up all the benches, tear them apart, etc. So
> no normal person would want to sit on the benches or even be *near* them...
>
> Anyways, if the homeless want to sit or recline they in this particular case
> can go to the homeless shelter - right...???
>
> Here in Chicawgo benches have a barrier in the middle so the homeless can't
> stretch out and sleep on them...
>
> It's obvious that you are ignernt of the vagaries of modern urban life,
> cyberkitty...

maybe you should move to celebration, florida, where uncle walt's
descendants don't allow such foolishness.

blake