On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:35:45 -0400, blake murphy >
wrote:

-->On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:19:53 -0700, sf wrote:
-->
-->> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:33:28 -0400, "cybercat" >
-->> wrote:
-->>
-->>>Do you admire this kind of petty nitpicking semantics game? As though there
-->>>are no stupid laws. I don't give a fat, selfish, smug suburbanite's ass WHAT
-->>>the law is, it is utterly petty and miserably small and uncaring to begrudge
-->>>the poor or needy your refuse. And yes you bet I am talking about YOU, sf.
-->>>If there is a law against them picking things up that are in containers
-->>>marked for disposal, it is a law designed to keep the riff raff out of the
-->>>fat ****ing smug suburban bitches' sight.
-->>
-->> It's not a game of semantics and I live in a city not suburbs. It's
-->> the law and you know it by this time. If the bins were on my
-->> property, they would be trespassing while they steal, but I am forced
-->> to put them on the sidewalk for pick up. Bins on the sidewalk doesn't
-->> mean it's open season to rummage.
-->>
-->> Wrap yourself up in the flag and sing *** bi ya, but you won't change
-->> my mind. It's stealing. They are stealing from me and the company I
-->> have a contract with. Wear your halo with pride - I will happily
-->> redirect anyone who wants to pick recyclables out of my bin over to
-->> your house.
-->
-->i'm telling you, armed guards are the only answer.
-->
-->blake

With armor piercing ammo of course.