On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:12:00 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Lin wrote:
>
>>> I think if anybody took the trouble to draw up stats of that nature, sf
>>> would *definitely* not be the worst offender in that respect. My guess
>>> would be either Greg or blake.
>>
>> Hands-down, Greggie. I've seen blake post about food (certainly more often
>> than some others).
>>
>> Dear, please don't pick on my blake! Even when it has nothing to do with
>> food, his wit makes me smile. And Greg? Well, I expect no more than what
>> we've been getting, so I'm not disappointed. Maybe a bit bored, but not
>> disappointed since I have no expectations.
>>
>> This one-upsmanship-bullshit is just that. Bullshit. Play nice guys,
>> please!
>
> Well, here are the stats on "your" blake: Tallying his posts from yesterday
> and today, blake posted 65 times. ONLY SEVEN of them were about food, and of
> those seven, several were of the "I've never had that" type, with no further
> contribution given. That gives him a "food percentage" of 10.8%
>
> Here are Greg's stats: 16 posts over that same time period, with 5 posts
> about food. So *he* has a "food percentage" of 31.3% -- MUCH better than
> "your" blake.
>

if you don't like my peaches, i suggest you killfile me. i'm not a moving
target.

blake