"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:05:48 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>
>> blake continued to lie:
>>
>>>> Please show where I "complained" about your OT posts. I didn't do any
>>>> such thing. In fact, I even SPECIFICALLY STATED that OT posts don't
>>>> bother me, so where are you seeing any complaint about it? I pointed
>>>> out
>>>> that you *do* send a lot of OT posts, but that was simply for the
>>>> purpose
>>>> of supporting my assertion that sf is not the worst offender in that
>>>> area.
>>>>
>>>
>>> o.k. i guess
>>>
>>>> Did I say you should be killfiled? I merely showed how seldom you post
>>>> about food. Even Sheldon and your ****tard have better records than you
>>>> in that area. OT posts don't bother me. I'm not the one who brought up
>>>> the issue of OT postings; all I did was count and compare.
>>>>
>>>
>>> only counts as a passive-aggressive complaint.
>>
>> It's not even a passive-aggressive complaint. You're reading "complaint"
>> into it where none exists. You seem to be conflating the concepts of
>> "cite"
>> and "complain." And it obviously bothers you so much that you're willing
>> to
>> openly lie in defense of yourself against... what?
>>
>> Bob
>
> o.k., by all means continue to keep track of the number of times i don't
> bother you as opposed to the number of times someone else doesn't bother
> you.
>

Fat Bob can count while sitting down. So he counts.