Nancy2 wrote:
>
>Reynolds' voice mail says it wasn't as successful as they had hoped -
>well, no wonder, I never saw a commercial or an advertisement for it.
>


Actually they ran out of ignoranus customers, so advertising would be
putting good money after bad.

Guess it took a while for Reynolds to figure out that normal brained
folks would rather keep their assets in the form of cold hard cash in
a savings bank than as hunks of animal flesh in their freezer...
'when/if one can' think about it there is nothing more low IQ than
freezing like a year's worth of meat (or any food). In the US there
is no food shortage and there are sales every day. Reynolds gave it a
shot because their consumer products line is gasping for breath. With
the advent of plastic wrap folks aren't buying nearly as much aluminum
foil as they once did, and with all the recloseable packaging
nowadasys, and all the eating out, folks are using less plastic wrap
than ever. I've no idea why folks would even consider spending all
that money on a machine that sucks, expensive packaging supplies, and
on energy to run a big freezer when fresh meat in the US is available
24/7/365.25.... they have to be obsessed with the an abject fear of
running out of food, there is no other rational explanation. I'd much
rather the stupidmarket pay to storage my perishables.... we're paying
their refrigeration, and 'lectric bill anyway, may as well get the
benefit. If there was any utility whatsoever in those silly food
saver gizmos the stupidmarkets would be happy to give them gratis to
every customer so as to reduce their own perishables storage costs, in
fact they would use them themeslves, it doesn't and they don't. Don't
yoose morons think that if they really served a utile purpose
butchers, fish mongers, etc. would include one free with a $500
purchase. And no one that lives within 50 miles of a stupidmarket
needs a stand alone freezer.