On Sep 16, 1:33�pm, Michael Coburn > wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:09:29 -0700, Lawyerkill wrote:
> > On Sep 15, 3:15 pm, Michael Coburn > wrote:
> >> >http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Medicare/2008/8-03-26-
>
> >> NewTrusteesReport.htm
>
> >> All of that looks to me that the new Democratic government is looking
> >> very closely at the problem and actually doing that which others in the
> >> past have paid lip service. This, no doubt, infuriates the rightarded.
>
> > Looking very closely at it? No it was just another 1000 pages bill they
> > wanted voted on with 24 hour notice, they didn't get away with it this
> > time. It was the public's outrage, and not the Democrats, that demanded
> > we take this slowly and think about it.
>

They tried to rush it to a vote before they went on vaction last
month. The public outcry stopped them. The only thing stopping them
now is that it seems no one can agree on anything. Not only can't the
Republicans agree with the Democrats, the Democrats can't agree with
the Democrats.

Some Democrats will not vote for it unless there's a public option,
some Democrats will not vote for it if there is a public option. The
latest is Baucus has a bill he wants passed, Rockefellar is agaisnt
it.

Well I have an Appellate case I'm working on right now so I'll let you
guys fight this out.

I could swear during the lower court's decision I saw a very large red
neon sign above the Judge's head flashing, "APPEAL THIS, PLEASE APPEAL
MY DECISION"