rfc "Fag Tagging"
blake murphy wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:04:24 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
>>
>>> Andy > : in
>>> rec.food.cooking
>>>
>>>> It's sad to read the Goombas and the Abels and the Sqwertz and the
>>>> Boatwrights, Cyber.*, etc. etc., post about others and collectively
>>>> cheerlead themselves to their 100 or so, so-called friends, while the
>>>> rest of the world watches.
>>>>
>>>> I call it "fag tagging."
>> Interesting choice of phrase. Does it have any meaning?
>>
>>>> You're all so typically uninspiring.
>> I don't know about the rest of them, but I'm usually considered a pretty
>> boring person.
>>
>>>> I don't require the "fag tag" moral support you strive on!
>> Still doesn't make sense.
>>
>>> WTF are you talking about Andy?
>> I think he's feeling picked on. I think we should give the guy a
>> chance, frankly. Up until yesterday, I thought he was doing much
>> better. I even changed my killfile entry so it will go away at some
>> point.
>>
>> I don't think we should pick on him so much...unless he really deserves
>> it.
>>
>> After all, nobody here would make fun of somebody because they were in a
>> wheelchair due to a double amputation.
>>
>> :-(
>
> the funny part is that he thinks it somehow hurts me. it just makes him
> look like the idiot he is.
>
> your pal,
> blake
Alas, that is true. I finally KF'd him during his last (or was it
the time before) go-around with you. I agree with Wayne, though.
It would be so nice to have a newsreader that could KF based on
content. OTOH, I wouldn't see your retorts, which do make me laugh.
--
Jean B.
|