rfc "Fag Tagging"
blake murphy wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:52:33 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>
>> blake murphy wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:04:24 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article >,
>>>> "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Andy > : in
>>>>> rec.food.cooking
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's sad to read the Goombas and the Abels and the Sqwertz and the
>>>>>> Boatwrights, Cyber.*, etc. etc., post about others and collectively
>>>>>> cheerlead themselves to their 100 or so, so-called friends, while the
>>>>>> rest of the world watches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I call it "fag tagging."
>>>> Interesting choice of phrase. Does it have any meaning?
>>>>
>>>>>> You're all so typically uninspiring.
>>>> I don't know about the rest of them, but I'm usually considered a pretty
>>>> boring person.
>>>>
>>>>>> I don't require the "fag tag" moral support you strive on!
>>>> Still doesn't make sense.
>>>>
>>>>> WTF are you talking about Andy?
>>>> I think he's feeling picked on. I think we should give the guy a
>>>> chance, frankly. Up until yesterday, I thought he was doing much
>>>> better. I even changed my killfile entry so it will go away at some
>>>> point.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think we should pick on him so much...unless he really deserves
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> After all, nobody here would make fun of somebody because they were in a
>>>> wheelchair due to a double amputation.
>>>>
>>>> :-(
>>> the funny part is that he thinks it somehow hurts me. it just makes him
>>> look like the idiot he is.
>>>
>>> your pal,
>>> blake
>> Alas, that is true. I finally KF'd him during his last (or was it
>> the time before) go-around with you. I agree with Wayne, though.
>> It would be so nice to have a newsreader that could KF based on
>> content. OTOH, I wouldn't see your retorts, which do make me laugh.
>
> thanks, toots. it shows that even a chancre like andy is part of god's
> great plan.
>
> your pal,
> blake
LOL!
--
Jean B.
|