blake murphy wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:45:51 -0500, Pete C. wrote:
>
> > SCP wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:43:43 -0500, "Pete C." > wrote:
> >>
> >> -->
> >> -->SCP wrote:
> >> -->>
> >> -->> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:08:50 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
> >> -->>
> >> -->> -->In article >,
> >> -->> --> SCP > wrote:
> >> -->> -->
> >> -->> -->> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:43:57 -0400, blake murphy
> >> -->> >
> >> -->> -->> wrote:
> >> -->> -->
> >> -->> -->> -->you say, for what they choose to cover and not cover - but the
> >> idea
> >> -->> that
> >> -->> -->> -->the government, or some other 'they' can suppress coverage is
> >> beyond
> >> -->> -->> -->stupid.
> >> -->> -->
> >> -->> -->> Do you know the cost of the war in Iraq as of last week?
> >> -->> -->
> >> -->> -->To Iraq or to Canada?
> >> -->>
> >> -->> I suppose I should of been specific for you Dan
> >> -->>
> >> -->> Anyone know what the cost of the US / Iraq war has cost up to today?
> >> -->
> >> -->Who is at war with the US / Iraq? I guess just al-queda, and I don't
> >> -->think they publish their budgetary information...
> >>
> >> No but it's cost the USA $600 Billion since 2001.
> >
> > So it's cost me like $25/mo or so to kill a bunch of dangerous wing nuts
> > before they can even get close to the US. Sounds like money well spent
> > to me, and certainly less than most folks spend on far more frivolous
> > stuff like cable TV.
>
> frankly, i'm more worried about domestic 'wing nuts.'
>
> blake

Frankly, you should be worried about both as there are real threats
posed by both, however the domestic threat is less likely to target the
general civilian population.