Anyone game for RFC 'chat'?
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:14:31 -0600, Lou Decruss
> wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0800, Mark Thorson >
>wrote:
>
>>Sky wrote:
>>>
>>> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
>>
>>You should only post to the mailing list of people who
>>actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
>>the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.
>
>I don't do chat but it seems if folks here want to try to get together
>it doesn't seem like it's an issue to announce it especially with all
>the other nonsense that get's posted here. There's a page on the RFC
>site with directions to get there so there must be some interest in
>it.
>
Directions are there so they don't need to be posted to the Newsgroup
and for no other reason whatsoever... nor should anything regarding
chat be posted to the Newsgroup... what happens in chat needs to stay
in chat. That's why the Chat is not safe, nothing said there is
sacred, and as far as I know nothing said there is logged... so go lie
your lonely-loser psychotic heads off.
|