Anyone game for RFC 'chat'?
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:19:15 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>
>> Directions are there so they don't need to be posted to the Newsgroup
>> and for no other reason whatsoever... nor should anything regarding
>> chat be posted to the Newsgroup... what happens in chat needs to stay
>> in chat. That's why the Chat is not safe, nothing said there is
>> sacred, and as far as I know nothing said there is logged... so go lie
>> your lonely-loser psychotic heads off.
>
>
>I don't do the chat thing very often, maybe once every month or two. I
>have encountered a lot of the regular posters in there. Sometimes there
>is no one there, so a post suggesting that someone is there are relevant
>to the group.
No it's not relevant, it's just being a gossip, and indicates that
whatever is said there will be blabbed... it's no ones business who
frequents chat.
|