Anyone game for RFC 'chat'?
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:19:15 -0500, Dave Smith wrote:
> brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> Directions are there so they don't need to be posted to the Newsgroup
>> and for no other reason whatsoever... nor should anything regarding
>> chat be posted to the Newsgroup... what happens in chat needs to stay
>> in chat. That's why the Chat is not safe, nothing said there is
>> sacred, and as far as I know nothing said there is logged... so go lie
>> your lonely-loser psychotic heads off.
>
> I don't do the chat thing very often, maybe once every month or two. I
> have encountered a lot of the regular posters in there. Sometimes there
> is no one there, so a post suggesting that someone is there are relevant
> to the group.
>
> I don't know what your paranoia is based on. I have never seen anything
> in chat they someone would have to be worried about being called on later.
>
more sheldon projection. though with all the psychotic crap he posts here,
i can't imagine why he'd fret that chat coulod come back on him later.
your pal,
blake
|