View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Lou Decruss[_3_] Lou Decruss[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,385
Default Anyone game for RFC 'chat'?

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:33:52 -0500, brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:14:31 -0600, Lou Decruss
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0800, Mark Thorson >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Sky wrote:
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
>>>
>>>You should only post to the mailing list of people who
>>>actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
>>>the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.

>>
>>I don't do chat but it seems if folks here want to try to get together
>>it doesn't seem like it's an issue to announce it especially with all
>>the other nonsense that get's posted here. There's a page on the RFC
>>site with directions to get there so there must be some interest in
>>it.
>>

>
>Directions are there so they don't need to be posted to the Newsgroup
>and for no other reason whatsoever... nor should anything regarding
>chat be posted to the Newsgroup...


Because you said so?

>what happens in chat needs to stay in chat.


I'll agree with that.

>That's why the Chat is not safe, nothing said there is
>sacred, and as far as I know nothing said there is logged...


On March 1st of last there was a thread in which a bot named nagger
was mentioned. I don't do chat and I don't know who controls nagger
and what it does but I have little doubt it has the capability to log.
Also anyone who is in irc can log. Even private chats can be logged.

>so go lie your lonely-loser psychotic heads off.


You're an idiot- newbie- liar. If you don't want to see chat posts
just killfile the word. Maybe someone will have to tell you how as
you seem to simple to grasp much.

Lou