On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:28:50 -0800, Dan Abel wrote:

> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:19:15 -0500, Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>>> brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Directions are there so they don't need to be posted to the Newsgroup
>>>> and for no other reason whatsoever... nor should anything regarding
>>>> chat be posted to the Newsgroup... what happens in chat needs to stay
>>>> in chat. That's why the Chat is not safe, nothing said there is
>>>> sacred, and as far as I know nothing said there is logged... so go lie
>>>> your lonely-loser psychotic heads off.
>>>
>>> I don't do the chat thing very often, maybe once every month or two. I
>>> have encountered a lot of the regular posters in there. Sometimes there
>>> is no one there, so a post suggesting that someone is there are relevant
>>> to the group.
>>>
>>> I don't know what your paranoia is based on. I have never seen anything
>>> in chat they someone would have to be worried about being called on later.
>>>
>>
>> more sheldon projection. though with all the psychotic crap he posts here,
>> i can't imagine why he'd fret that chat coulod come back on him later.
>
> Just try looking up his old posts in Google. Just try. They're gone.

i'd rather drink ink.

> I believe they've been purged twice. Along with his Google account.
> He's got good cause to be concerned.

i'd say he's more immediately concerned with the local police.

your pal,
blake