Sky wrote:
> Steve Pope wrote:
>>
>> Sky > wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the link and suggestions. I imagine the 'beast' was fed
>>> to the (2) dogs -- literally! -- but I'm unsure of that because I
>>> was not the hostess nor was I the cook. Cooking is a lot like
>>> cutting hair, eh??? It's so much easier to cook a little bit at a
>>> time (or snip off a little at a time) than to over-cook anything
>>> (or over-cut hair!)! I'd rather have a nearly rare beast that
>>> needs a wee bit more cooking than a roast that had its goose cooked
>>> to ruin.
>>
>> For sure. But there is the technical question about what to
>> do with a too-rare roast that has already come out of the oven
>> and been rested.
>>
>> In my experience, placing it back into the oven does not work
>> too well. Whereas sometimes microwaving it for a very short
>> interval -- somewhere between 30 and 90 seconds, depending -- does
>> the trick. (Kinda looks cheesy to you guests, placing the roast in
>> the microwave... so best to avoid the problem in the first place...)
>>
>> Steve
>
> Better that than an over-cooked beast that's destined for the dogs,
> eh? Rarely (pun intended, eh??? <G>) have I encountered a 'beast'
> that was too rare for me.
>
> Sky, who say's "moo"!!! <G>

I must say that I find it hard to believe that the tastes of your family are
so rarified that there is literally NOTHING to be done with beef that is
cooked well done but feed it to dogs!