Omelet wrote:
> In article >, "Jean B." >
> wrote:
>
>> Omelet wrote:
>>> In article >,
>>> "Ophelia" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jean B." > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Maybe things are different there, Janet, but here, most doctors have
>>>>> virtually NO education in the field of nutrition, and even many of the
>>>>> people who have studied nutrition cling to outdated notions.
>>>> No, Jean. Things are pretty much the same here too
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> IMO, sports nutritionists seem to be the most up to date.
>>> Chiropractors are also pretty good with it.
>> That's interesting. Broadening things out a bit, the
>> non-mainstream health magazines, which I used to read quite
>> regularly and should start reading again (suggestions, anyone)
>> frequently would be discussing nutrition-related things, and only
>> years later would these things be recognized as valid by the
>> medical community as a whole.
>
> Try reading nutritional articles in body building or fitness magazines.
> Muscle and Fitness (imho) is the only really decent bodybuilding mag
> while mags on other general sports are good also.

Thanks, Om. Yesterday I was waiting for someone and was glancing
at nutrition-related articles in a health magazine. I really need
to start looking at all such sources again. I used to be so much
more aware of cutting-edge thought on medicine and especially
nutrition.

--
Jean B.