Dave Smith > writes:

> Michel Boucher wrote:
>> sf > wrote in news:hthro5pg8kkdhkihf2tpgnhhf233a6klvl@
>> 4ax.com:
>>
>>>> Sounds like cattiness to me. She's good at doing what she does and you
>>>> don't like her for it.
>>>
>>> Doing what she does so well means making middle aged men feel like
>>> they can get a piece of her *ss if they wish enough for it?
>>
>> It isn't anything like that, I assure you. There is no hint of sex per se
>> in her approach. Hell, she doesn't even do cleavage (at least on the
>> cooking show), unlike Giada, not that there is anything wrong with that.
>> No, it's more like a pleasant half-hour with someone who is sensuous about
>> what she does in front of the camera, cooking. And she obviously does it
>> well enough that the ratio of women to men who dislike her on this group is
>> around 10:1 (that 1 is Lou).

How do you know? It's quite obvious from the prissy names and writing
style that most "Women" here are in fact hairy fat guys called Bob who
are squeezed into their mother's pantyhose. You can tell from the
continual fake bonhomie and references to "hubbies dinner".

>>
>> When I say she is the goddess, I am of course referring to her callypigian
>> proportion or, as Precious Ramotswe said, "a woman of traditional
>> proportion" which got her into trouble as I recall.
>>
>
> I am with you Michel. She is a goddess.