In article
>,
Dan Abel > wrote:

> > > 'Scuse me Blake babe, but I did NOT write that!!!
> >
> > Admittedly the attribution was borked, but I read it as calling your
> > attention to the post.
>
> No, the attributions were fine. Go back and look if you are interested.
> Om mangled them, including taking out the part that she posted, and
> Blake was responding to, although Blake did quote what she posted about
> 'good person at heart'.
>
> Pretty obviously, Om is too nice a person to have written the stuff
> above.

Om tries. Truly. At least most of the time. ;-) Thank you.
>
> To go into "lecture" mode, I think this is part of the problem with poor
> trimming of posts. People just get in the habit of ignoring what is
> left in, since often much is irrelevant and unnecessary. But Blake
> carefully left in what actually applied, and I suspect that Om just
> skipped it. It was a little complicated, because Blake wasn't
> responding to what was immediately above, or even above that, but what
> was three levels above.
>
> --
> Dan Abel

Nobody is perfect. <g> It gets tricky when you are responding to two
people.
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>

Subscribe: