Dale, for the record,

I had no issue with any of M. Tommassi's posts on his participation with the
Venice issues. In fact they were humorous as well. His assumption on
Venice was fine.

What I take issue with is that someone in the group asks for clarity...and
therefore the poster replied and provided same. Others then debated why
clarity was ever needed. That is what my issue is.

Ian is totally incorrect that any of my statements here were America-Centric
or Pro American.

It only shows how this group can be polarized over a simple question of
clarity be provided.

the end.
"Dale Williams" > wrote in message
...
> In article k.net>,
Dwmidnt
> writes:
>
> >In any case I think that AFW can do without
>
> Oops, premature ej..I mean premature posting.
>
> I meant to say AFW can do without namecalling and derision. Even if we
disagree
> let's try to be semi-mature about it. Thanks all.
> Dale
>
> Dale Williams
> Drop "damnspam" to reply