On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:17:14 -0800, sf wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:37:34 -0500, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:17:55 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:06:37 +0000 (UTC), Steve Pope wrote:
>>>
>>>> And commercial shrimp... arg. There are all sorts of quality
>>>> problems there, whereas wild-caught shrimp is difficult to come by
>>>> not to mention expensive, usually.
>>>
>>> We both (Om and I) get the same wild caught Gulf shrimp lately for
>>> around $5/lb. But the problem is that it sucks. It has a very
>>> strong iodine/bleach taste. So even if it's earth friendly and
>>> humanely raised <cough>, it's just not worth eating.
>>
>> see, that makes them *extra* earth-friendly and humane. you're not tempted
>> to over-consume them.
>>
>
> *Wild caught* shrimp humanely *raised* does not compute.

I guess she missed the <cough> part and the sarcasm thereafter.

-sw