"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:34:51 -0400, Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick
> wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:57:33 -0500, John Hanson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not when the Earth revolves around you like it does in my case. If you
>>>> don't
>>>> want to read it, skip it.
>>>
>>> How do you know you don't want to read it if you don't read it?
>>> Posts to Usenet are expected to be of general interest to the groups
>>> to which they were posted,
>>
>> Like this one, for instance, eh?
>>
>> Jolly good show.
>
> Ahh, the same old argument all losers pose when backed into a
> corner.

Riiiggghhttt.

"Backed into a corner".

That's almost as rube-ish as saying "Checkmate"!

> Another point of logic is that you can't fix the problem if you
> don't talk about it. So automatically, anybody who says anything
> about OT posts is automatically a hypocrite for being OT themselves.

The rest of this desperate attempt as justification is easily ignorable,
but I just wanted to highlight you describing yourself as hypocritical.

> It's a classic catch-22. And guess what... You're not exactly
> breaking any new ground here.
>
> Isn't there an established and proven theory regarding people's
> propensity to bring up this same pathetic argument time after time?
> If not, I'd like to coin it the, "Wertz Principle".

What, repeated whining OT posts about OT posting?

You're right.

Has a nice ring to it.

> I will define it better and send it out to all the groups (with OT
> in the subject, of course - you can't talk about Usenet on Usenet,
> remember?)


Ah.

Spam your whining.

Excellent.


--
--
Popeye
"If one does as God does enough times, one
will become as God is." -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

www.finalprotectivefire.com
http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762