On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:54:45 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:51:54 -0400, sweetblood
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> 'blake murphy[_2_ Wrote:
>>> ;1454183']On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:03:36 GMT, PLucas wrote:-
>>>
>>> To tell you the truth Om, I've never seen the bitch behave any other
>>> way.
>>>
>>> She, amd quite a few others on here just like her, show their *real*
>>> mental age/deficiency with their spiteful little backstabbing posts....
>>>
>>> because more often than not, the person they are bitching about has
>>> them
>>> killfiled.
>>>
>>> Talk about blowing hot air for nothing!!!! LOL!!!
>>>
>>> Here's a hint Tadpoleski.........
>>>
>>> If you don't like someone, killfile them, or ignore them when they
>>> morph
>>> and change ID's. To continually bitch, whine, **** and moan *really*
>>> shows
>>> the world what a complete mental ****tard you are.-
>>>
>>> thank you, peter, for your tips on conducting civil discourse on
>>> usenet.
>>>
>>> blake
>>
>> thanks for sharing the recipe...
>
> This post settles the question in my mind wondering if there's a
> moderator in foodbanter that filters out nonfood posts. Foodbanter
> doesn't skim, it just steals all rec.food.cooking content.

screening would require someone to do some actual work.

your pal,
blake