In news:rec.food.cooking, Mark Thorson > posted on Wed,
14 Apr 2010 23:45:06 -0700 the following:

> Damaeus wrote:
>
> > In news:rec.food.cooking, Mark Thorson > posted on Wed,
> > 14 Apr 2010 13:11:00 -0700 the following:
> >
> > > I don't believe that article for a second.
> > > It's from an anti-GMO web site.
> >
> > That makes a lot of sense: "I don't believe that because the website
> > where it's hosted is posting articles that are on-topic for its purpose."
>
> If they are posting garbage articles, it's fair
> to consider all of its articles to be garbage.
>
> > http://citruspie.com/health-highligh...-eat-gm-foods/
>
> This is another example of garbage. It's from the American Academy of
> Environmental Medicine, a well-known crazy group. They promote fears of
> chemicals that are non-scientific, as described here.
>
> http://www.quackwatch.org/01Quackery...opics/mcs.html
>
> If there was a shred of truth in the fear-mongering over GMO crops, it
> would be possible to cite non-crazy sources of information to document
> these alleged adverse effects. As you have demonstrated, that is not
> possible.

Those sources are not crazy just because you say they are. You seem to be
against anyone who has any kind of concern over the effects of things like
genetically modified foods, cotton, vaccines and whatnot. You could be on
someone's payroll, expected to come onto rec.food.cooking, where
discussions about genetically modified foods are likely to arise, where
you can try to characterize as idiots those who actually have valid
concerns. Your calling everyone crazy who has a concern of the type I
describe isn't really fair. You could be exposing your own evilness by
taking the side of Monsanto and vaccine producers.

Your quoting of Quackwatch is suspsect. Those people are crazy, too. They
believe nothing out there is bad for them, just because they luuuuuv
science and believe that if science modifies an apple to make it twice as
large, twice as sweet, and twice as juicy, then it must mean the apple is
better for us, as well, even if it gives you pancreatic herpes unawares.

I used to be on Quackwatch's e-mail discussion list, and that's a pack of
lunatics if I've ever been caught in the middle of one. Every concern
that came along, they laughed at and rolled their eyes at, just because
the concern questioned the glory of science.

Congratulations. You're just as looney as they are.

Damaeus
--
"Marijuana inflames the erotic impulses and leads to revolting sex
crimes"
-Daily Mirror (1924)