On 06/05/2010 14:33, John Kuthe wrote:
> On May 6, 7:58 am, Dirk Bruere at >
> wrote:
>> On 06/05/2010 13:46, John Kuthe wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 6, 6:57 am, Food > wrote:
>>>> On May 4, 1:25 pm, "Mr. > wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 4, 8:15 am, "Ted > wrote:
>>
>>>>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>>
>>>>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? No
>>>>> one in the media will say it.
>>
>>>> Why isn't Timothy McVeigh referred to as Christian Terrorist? Islamic
>>>> would also be a bad choice of words. Islamist would be fine, because
>>>> he is likely associated with the movement that aims to create Sunni
>>>> Muslim theocracies in many of the Muslim dominated countries, possibly
>>>> even doing away with those borders in favorite of one giant caliphate.
>>
>>>> But again, why wouldn't we call McVeigh a *Christainist* terrorist?
>>>> Why don't we refer to the Hutaree as Christainist terrorists? Even
>>>> this Wiccan site doesn't go that far, instead calling them "Christian
>>>> warriors":http://thewatch.wicasta.com/?p=1057
>>
>>> Quote from the website above:
>>
>>> "...a militia group has armed themselves and is actively promoting
>>> rebellion against the Federal government."
>>
>>> That is so funny! The U.S. Military so far out-guns anything this puny
>>> little "militia group" has with their camo and their little infantry
>>> war games! How could they ever expect to be victorious?
>>
>>> John Kuthe...
>>
>> The Taliban, with less, seems to be doing OK
>
> Uh, yeah RIGHT! One notable attack (911) and a lot of noise,

The Taliban did not attack the USA.
You are confusing them with Al Quaida.

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show