On Sat, 15 May 2010 20:51:58 -0400, brooklyn1 wrote:

> On Sat, 15 May 2010 14:18:24 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:16:19 -0400, brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>>> As the diameter of the candy decreases the ratio of cheaper sugar
>>> coating to chocolate increases by the square of its diameter... ie. a
>>> pound of 1/8" candy contains four times the sugar coating as a pound
>>> of 1/4" candies. The smaller candies also require a lot less
>>> packaging materials.
>>
>>Go back to your 9th grade geometry class. A M&M is
>>three-dimensional object.
>
> I keep saying how you never passed your GED... or you'd know there is
> also solid geometry... sqwartz, you are truly an imbecile... a Mini
> M&M has a higher IQ than you.

Yeah,. Solid geometry. It deals with three dimensional objects,
just like. Your formula is for a 2-dimensional perfect circle.

See, I went to college (several, even) instead of joining the Navy
to be a lowly mass-production cook.

Are you done babbling yet, or did you want to say more?

-sw