In article >,
Bob Muncie > wrote:
>On 6/2/2010 10:55 AM, Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:

>> I hear what you are trying to say, but the information is also useful to
>> those of us caught in the crossfire. Because Bob Muncie had
>> previously brought it into public play by ragging on someone else's
>> marriage, that means ALL OF US.
>>
>> Personally, I felt uncomfortable (e.g. ever so slightly creeped out) by
>> BM's attention to me - which really seemed to come out of nowhere - even
>> before I got the additional information. Which does help explain the
>> behavior, not excuse it. If I'd known before, at least I would have known
>> exactly where my "eww" came from, and I would have had the answer to the
>> eternal question, "WTF?".

>Not an issue Charlotte - the fact you are uncomfortable, is something I
>understand.
>You and BT are likely the same. I am not willing to go further. But I
>would want the rest of the folks that post here to know that you are
>what you are. and that BT is you.

You know, Bob, I'm glad you said somewhere else that you were running a
sleep deficit.

Because otherwise my response to "you and Bob are likely the same" and
"Bob is you" would be:

Are you ****in' high?!!?

Too bad I can't use large sparkly text on Usenet.

Seriously - leave for a while, get some rest, get your head together some
with whatever help you need. Then think about coming back. Because
you're Posting While Impaired and that never ends well.

Peace, over, and out!

Charlotte
--