On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:52:46 -0400, blake murphy wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:04:33 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:30:16 +1000, atec7 7 wrote:
>>
>>> Wouldn't you find more satisfaction in blocking the fake peter which you
>>> can do by looking at headers instead of looking uninformed ?
>>
>> Even the normal Peter (when not in one of his fugue states of
>> being as Peter Stalker), is proven not worth reading. He's a
>> pompous, self-centered, egotistical, narcissistic asshole.
>>
>> When he posts as his stalkers, he's actually normal in comparison.
>> That why he invented his own stalkers.
>
> i can't go along with your theory that he is his own stalker. that would
> be mildly interesting, an attribute that neither he nor his stalkers
> possess.

Gravity, relativity, evolution, and Everything are still
technically theories as well. Even though they have been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt and have never been disproven. At what
point does a theory become a fact?

-sw