On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:11:14 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:47:35 +0200, ChattyCathy
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 07:32:46 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:04:30 +0200, jack > wrote:
>> >
>> >> And why brag about text editors? Because with a text editor one can edit
>> >> a configuration file sitting right at the machine, or over a shaky 2400
>> >> baud remote link. Try doing that with a 'word processor'.
>> >
>> > Somebody is still living in the dinosaur age.
>>
>> Well, last time I checked, Jack was pretty agile for somebody from that
>> age. Besides, "vi" - as much as you'd like to "poo-poo" it (because it's
>> completely "text-based") is not too shabby either. As a matter of fact,
>> quite a bit of code for the current RFC site was written using vi...
>
> Using Vi on your Linux?

Of course. Where else? I haven't used Windoze since *before* I took over
as webmistress.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy