Jinx wrote:

> First of all, the data on your site is comprised of relatively old data
> from 2002 and 2003, and is based on data gathered from routine health
> examinations only. Notice how all the countries on your list are highly
> industrialized countries with higher standards of living and access to
> healthcare than other countries. There's not one developing country on
> the list. In India as in other developing countries, access to
> healthcare, especially for routine health examinations, is not readily
> available. If you don't have people going in for routine well-checkups,
> you're not going to have data.
>
> Secondly, your extremely limited experience and observation of Indian
> people in *Texas* is hardly representative of Indians in general, and more
> specifically Indians in India. And the fact that you use that observation
> to back up your claim is laughable.

She's succumbed to the voices in her head just like her buddy Pussy. There's
no point in presenting facts; it would only confuse her even further.

There's also the little issue of typical Indian lifespan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ife_expectancy

Heart disease and diabetes are rampant in India, both of which can be blamed
on the Indian diet. It is *not* healthy. (Tasty, true, but not healthy.)

Bob