"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
...
> Jinx wrote:
>
>> First of all, the data on your site is comprised of relatively old data
>> from 2002 and 2003, and is based on data gathered from routine health
>> examinations only. Notice how all the countries on your list are highly
>> industrialized countries with higher standards of living and access to
>> healthcare than other countries. There's not one developing country on
>> the list. In India as in other developing countries, access to
>> healthcare, especially for routine health examinations, is not readily
>> available. If you don't have people going in for routine well-checkups,
>> you're not going to have data.
>>
>> Secondly, your extremely limited experience and observation of Indian
>> people in *Texas* is hardly representative of Indians in general, and
>> more
>> specifically Indians in India. And the fact that you use that
>> observation
>> to back up your claim is laughable.
>
> She's succumbed to the voices in her head just like her buddy Pussy.
> There's
> no point in presenting facts; it would only confuse her even further.
>
> There's also the little issue of typical Indian lifespan.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ife_expectancy
>
> Heart disease and diabetes are rampant in India, both of which can be
> blamed
> on the Indian diet. It is *not* healthy. (Tasty, true, but not healthy.)

I have to say though that when I lived in India (around 15 years ago) most
people were skinny.
--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/