On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:37:52 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:56:01 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:
>
>> In article
>> >,
>> Food Snob® > wrote:
>>
>>> Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?
>>
>> Many times. Many times.
>>
>> After Stu unloaded his threat, he didn't post for a short while. Some
>> people thought it was odd that he stopped posting. Well, no, that's
>> what the attorneys always say. That told *me* that maybe he really did
>> it. Then he started posting again! And things that he really shouldn't
>> have posted.
>>
>> So now he has stopped again. I don't know what that means, but maybe,
>> just maybe, he is listening to his attorney.
>
> He doesn't have an attorney (you actually believe that?). At
> least not for Usenet he doesn't. He may have a defense lawyer
> with all the copyrighted materials on his website.
>
> He's probably just not posting out of embarrassment. Maybe he
> finally did wise up. The last post I saw from him was his defense
> about his stolen pictures on his web site. Soon after that,
> nada-zilch.
>
> -sw

i suppose that's possible, but the idea of stu either wising up or being
embarrassed seems an unlikely one.

your pal,
blake