On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:58:41 -0700 (PDT), Manda Ruby wrote:

> On Jul 14, 1:17*pm, Nancy2 > wrote:
>> On Jul 14, 2:02*pm, Michel Boucher > wrote:
>>
>>> Manda Ruby > wrote
>>> s.com:
>>
>>> > That doesn't mean the a professor or adjunct professor in
>>> > Chemistry can get away going to the interview with a tennis
>>> > shoe.
>>
>>> Why not? *Do they mix formulae with their feet? *I fail to see the
>>> reasoning.
>>
>>> --
>>
>> Well, see, Michel, she said "with A tennis shoe." *One really might
>> wonder if someone showed up at an interview with only one shoe
>> on....
>>
>> (P.S., reasoning is a foreign concept for her.)
>>
>> N.
>
> It is very clear that Nancy feels some soft of inadequacy and feels
> the need to act like she's been doing in this thread. You're barking
> at the wrong person. All you're acheiving is getting my wrath aimed at
> you and I am good with words, rude words, when I am ****ed off. But I
> can't waste too much time on it and so I'll just use one word that
> starts with "r" in the future. Comprande?

'good with words'? is that a joke?

blake