"Pennyaline" wrote
> cshenk wrote:

>> Ok, trying little words. We have enough, we don't care if the smoke
>> value is minmal.

>> Got it yet?

> I had that point all along, and the next time you truncate a post for
> quoting, include the part you're actually responding to. It was clear that
> I understood you both have more than enough of your blessed wood. Now, you
> try grasping this: What about his post about barbecuing that is actually
> grilling am I not grasping?

> Got it yet?

Sure! You do not grasp that his term is different.

I do not overquote and trimmed to just what I was replying to. If you have
problems recalling, keep the thread so you can look back.