On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 03:29:53 -0700 (PDT), Food SnobŪ
> wrote:
>On Aug 6, 7:18*am, Pennyaline > wrote:
>> On 8/6/2010 06:05, Food SnobŪ wrote:
>>
>> > Of course no one would read the bad excuse for a recipe, then assume
>> > that "shortening" meant Crisco-type, partially hydrogenated
>> > shortening. *I mean, no one would be f-ing stupid enough to use that
>> > shit these days, right?
>>
>> Shortening is shortening, no matter what the product is called.
>>
>> And yes, the Crisco-type solid shortenings are used all the time by all
>> kinds of people. There is no greater harm in using those than in using
>> butter, and they are far better baking result-wise and health-wise than
>> most of the butter imitators on the market.
>
>You should call yourself Pennyasinine, because what you wrote above is
>astoundingly stupid.
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroge...h_implications
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_f...and_regulation
>
>--Bryan
And you should call yourself "Bound up Bryan" because you are in
serious need of an enema.