View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Lionel Hutz, Esq.[_2_] Lionel Hutz, Esq.[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Willing To Pay Higher Restaurant Prices?



"Bryan" > wrote in message
...
> On Sep 14, 7:04 pm, "Lionel Hutz, Esq." > wrote:
>> "Lionel Hutz, Esq." > wrote in
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Bryan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >> On Sep 11, 10:05 pm, "Lionel Hutz, Esq." > wrote:
>> >>> "Bryan" > wrote in message

>>
>> ...

>>
>> >>> > On Sep 11, 12:19 am, "Lionel Hutz, Esq." > wrote:
>> >>> >> "Bryan" > wrote in message

>>
>> >>> ...

>>
>> >>> >> > --Bryan, who is going to *be* a landlord for the first time,
>> >>> >> > which
>> >>> >> > is
>> >>> >> > weird

>>
>> >>> >> Will you be placing restrictions in the lease concerning the foods
>> >>> >> that
>> >>> >> you
>> >>> >> will allow your prospective tenants to bring onto the premises,
>> >>> >> prepare
>> >>> >> and
>> >>> >> consume?

>>
>> >>> > No, though luckily the woman who is renting it is not from a curry
>> >>> > culture. I hate going into a motel to check it out and smelling
>> >>> > that
>> >>> > stuff. If I smell the slightest hint of curry, I won't rent a
>> >>> > room.
>> >>> > I have nothing against Indians/Pakistanis, but I want motel rooms
>> >>> > to
>> >>> > be odor free.

>>
>> >>> > --Bryan

>>
>> >>> So, no unholy reign of terror if the tenants use Cool Whip or jarred
>> >>> mayonnaise or "Hormel" chili? Or have a Butterball and jarred gravy
>> >>> for
>> >>> Thanksgiving? No name calling? Really? Just no "curry culture",
>> >>> huh?
>> >>> As
>> >>> a landlord, you really have to be careful with that racial profiling
>> >>> thing,
>> >>> you know.

>>
>> >> I didn't say I wouldn't rent to curry users, just that I'm glad that
>> >> the tenant is not. I should put in the lease--in addition to no
>> >> smoking--a paragraph about odors. Heck, if the lady goes on the
>> >> internet and brags about her cooking, and it happens to be as you
>> >> described, I'd have a good reason to not be insulting to her. That
>> >> doesn't apply to anyone else here.

>>
>> >> --Bryan

>>
>> > And just what would that good reason for not being insulting to her be?

>>
>> Your (notice the lack of apostrophe) silence tells me you know where this
>> is
>> going. And I'm sure you will tell me that my summation is wrong.

>
> Obviously it is because I would have the sort of relationship that
> would be best kept amicable. I have no such relationship with anyone
> in the marketplace of ideas that is Usenet.
>
> My "silence" was because I have other things going on other than this
> NG. You're obviously not a real lawyer.
>
> --Bryan


Ah. Fear of retribution in real life. Understandable.