On 9/24/2010 2:41 AM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 04:20:58 GMT, Aussie
> > wrote:
>
>> > wrote in news:nn8o9617mctpvcu0s9ii3mvh9n1b904sq2@
>> 4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:20:16 GMT, Aussie
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> LOL!! Sorta like the sticker I had on one of my cars...... "This car is
>>>> protected by Smith and Wesson 4 days a week. You guess which 4 days." :-)
>>>
>>> A veiled threat. I'm so scared.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Humour seems to be lost on you some days, isn't it?
>>
> It wasn't funny, therefore it's not humor.

Actually it was, just not to you.

>> Anyways, it was a direct correaltion example to what "J. Clarke" was saying
>> about using a CCW licence as ID.
>
> Oh, okay. HAR HAR HAR.

Thing is, in this state one needs the CCW to have a handgun in one's
possession at all, including driving to the range with it locked in the
trunk. So having the CCW and actually going armed on a regular basis
have little correlation.