On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:21:39 -0700, Arri London >
wrote:
>
>
>Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> "Arri London" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> >
>> > Ophelia wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Arri London" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> > Back in the 'old days' oysters used to be so cheap and plentiful (in
>> >> > the
>> >> > US as well as Britain) that they were food for the poor. An oyster
>> >> > sandwich was eating at the bottom of the barrel, literally. Think
>> >> > Colchester in the past data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68dd/e68ddc8ac511f8bf72cf18574fec7aa4b5673560" alt="Smile"
>> >>
>> >> Yes! I have read stories of the poor complaining about having to eat
>> >> salmondata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68dd/e68ddc8ac511f8bf72cf18574fec7aa4b5673560" alt="Smile"
>> >>
>> >
>> > Must be nice, ya?
>>
>> Heh they thought they were badly offdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68dd/e68ddc8ac511f8bf72cf18574fec7aa4b5673560" alt="Smile"
>
>
>In those days, there were. Salmon is affordable locally as a treat. Too
>pricey to eat on a regular basis.
Nothing beats smoked whitefish.
http://www.murrayssturgeon.com/ShowMenu.tpl