On Nov 1, 7:32*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:21:39 -0700, Arri London >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >Ophelia wrote:
>
> >> "Arri London" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >> > Ophelia wrote:
>
> >> >> "Arri London" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >> > Back in the 'old days' oysters used to be so cheap and plentiful (in
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > US as well as Britain) that they were food for the poor. An oyster
> >> >> > sandwich was eating at the bottom of the barrel, literally. Think
> >> >> > Colchester in the past
>
> >> >> Yes! * I have read stories of the poor complaining about having to eat
> >> >> salmon
>
> >> > Must be nice, ya?
>
> >> Heh they thought they were badly off
>
> >In those days, there were. Salmon is affordable locally as a treat. Too
> >pricey to eat on a regular basis.
>
> Nothing beats smoked whitefish.http://www.murrayssturgeon.com/ShowMenu.tpl

==
Black Alaskan Cod isn't too bad either.
==