On Nov 7, 8:49*am, Omelet > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
> *Bryan > wrote:
> > On Nov 6, 8:26*am, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die spammer.biz>
> > wrote:
> > > Bryan wrote:
> > > >>>> Sycophant wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.
>
> > > >>>>>> He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
> > > >>>>>> high.
>
> > > >>>>>> --Bryan
>
> > > >>>>> ROFL! Good one Bryan. ;-D
>
> > > >>>> ROFL! Sycophant thinks you're talking about me, rather than about
> > > >>>> Chester.
> > > >>>> Not very bright, that one.
>
> > > >>> I assumed that she read the thread and found it funny on its own
> > > >>> merits. *YOU buying Cool Whip would make no sense, and would render
> > > >>> the joke unfunny.
>
> > > >> Thanks Bryan. ;-)
>
> > > > You're welcome, but I was just calling it as I saw it.
>
> > > Funny thing is, Sycophant *still* doesn't comprehend that you were making
> > > fun of Chester. She really is that stupid.
>
> > We'll see if she can make any kind of a reasonable argument against
> > the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka
> > Obamacare.
> > She, George and Goomba might all look pretty stupid, or...maybe one or
> > more of them could admit they were mistaken, which would be a smart
> > thing to do. *There's no shame in *having been* incorrect.
> > More likely they'll be too cowardly to engage, but again, we'll see.
>
> > > Bob
>
> > --Bryan
>
> I am done with discussing politics on this list.
> It does not belong here. At all.
>
> Nothing cowardly about it. I've finally simply come to my senses!
> You would be wise to do so too.

How convenient when you've taken an indefensible position. Perhaps
one of the other two folks will show some backbone.
> --
> Peace! Om
>
--Bryan