On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:05:24 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote:

> On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:27:56 -0400, "Ed Pawlowski" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"dsi1" > wrote
>>>
>>> My understanding of the ordnance is that these "Happy" meals have to meet
>>> certain requirements in order to have a toy as a premium: a cap on the
>>> maximum calories and they must have a fruit and vegetable. The board
>>> couldn't dictate McDonalds menu so they're using kid's toys as leverage.
>>> Sounds like a dirty commie plot to me. :-)
>>>
>>
>>Talk about chipping away at citizen's rights. I agree that most fast food
>>is not so healthy, but if I want to eat lard and sugar sandwiches, I should
>>be able to make that decision on my own. Next step will be regulating the
>>home. If mom does not cook a nutritious enough meal, she won't be able to
>>play with the toys in the bedroom tonight.
>
> Next thing those Whacko Kalyfornicators will insist on removing the
> toy from Crackerjacks... those sicko left coast *******'s Happy Meals
> will include a joint... hey, it's veggie!

you calling anyone 'sick' is pretty goddamn funny.

blake