On Nov 7, 8:54*pm, George > wrote:
> On 11/7/2010 5:40 PM, sf wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:22:23 -0500, >
> > wrote:
>
> >> Not hard to see why you still don't get why she had the gavel removed
> >> from her hand last Tuesday?
>
> > Sorry, George... wrong again. *She didn't lose her seat and you can't
> > be majority leader if your party didn't retain majority. *It's as
> > simple as that. *She has the votes lined up to be the minority leader..
>
> "Having the gavel removed from her hand" clearly means something
> different than loosing her seat.
>
> As I said before if you don't get it you simply won't see why the
> election turned out as it did. Lots of folks have had enough of the
> elitism and Pilosi loosing her position is a result of the people
> expressing that on Tuesday. And don't misunderstand that I want the days
> of old either because both parties worked together to get us where we
> are today.

The fact that you repeatedly misspell Speaker Pelosi's name suggests
that you have heard it a lot, but have seldom seen it in print. Maybe
Fox News? AM propaganda radio?

So, what are your objections to the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act?
And while we're at it, why don't you want to tax the wealthy to help
the deficit?
Oh, that's right, the wealthy are like gods. Like gods they "create,"
in their case, create jobs, and of course jobs that they can siphon
profits from are so much more real than public works jobs. That goes
without saying...or does it?

--Bryan