On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:57:06 -0800 (PST), Bryan
> wrote:

> On Nov 13, 1:54*pm, sf > wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:11:12 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888
> >
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > It's already the law in Santa Clara County, which seems determined to
> > > take the crown as the Nanny State leader. Now you cannot smoke in your
> > > non-detached home (applies in unincorporated areas only). I guess they
> > > feel the lower classes should not be smoking anyways. Light up my
> > > Cohiba pls.
> >
> > I heard that on the radio yesterday, but I thought it was a ban on
> > smoking in apartments, condominiums and townhouses - not detached
> > houses. *Who is going to enforce the law in this day of cutbacks? *My
> > guess is that it will be put at the bottom of the pile of all the
> > other unenforced laws already on the books.
> >
> >
> You read his post wrong. It doesn't apply to detaches houses. A
> better thing would be to have apartment buildings designated from the
> get go.
>

Agreed that apartments should be designed and *built* better; and
you're right, I misread.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.