On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:16:59 -0600, Omelet wrote:

> In article .com>,
> "Pete C." > wrote:
>
>> Omelet wrote:
>> >
>> > In article >,
>> > ChattyCathy > wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:27:23 -0600, Pete C. wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Well, in the U.S. at least, taking people's picture in a public setting
>> > > > does not require their permission.
>> > >
>> > > Same here. But most people assume their pictures won't be put up on a
>> > > website so they can be the object of ridicule. Guess I'm one of the few
>> > > that finds the POW website distasteful. So be it.
>> >
>> > Not.
>> >
>> > I find it to be downright tasteless.
>>
>> A substantial percentage of the Wal-Creatures featured on the POW site
>> dress the way they do because they desperately crave attention.
>
> EXACTLY!!
>
> Imho exhibitionists are getting exactly what they want!
>
> So lighten up people. ;-)

Have to wonder if the clothing you are wearing in your RFC mugshot would
go unnoticed at a Wal-Mart store...

http://www.recfoodcooking.com/mug/sh...th%20Kitty.jpg
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy