On Dec 9, 10:57*am, Dave Smith > wrote:
> On 09/12/2010 11:28 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>
>
> > The premise is obviously much too profound for your very limited
> > intellect, bwrrrryan.... entertainers are, have always been, and
> > always will be the most easily replaceable. *Entertainers like Lennon
> > are remembered by those whose minds were most maleable in the era when
> > they became popularized and nothing more. *The Beatles became popular
> > for their appearance, not their appearances... they were as talentless
> > as you... if only you weren't so ugly. LOL
>
> Poppycock. The Beatles are the exception. While their music may have
> been rejected by the older generation at the time, it was later embraced
> by people of all ages. I was first exposed to the Beatles in 1964, 46
> years ago. Hardly a day goes by that I don't hear Beatle music played on
> the radio or in malls and restaurants. I was a teen when they were in
> their heyday. My son was born more than a decade after they broke up,
> and he likes their music. *Unlike most other performers, the Beatles
> have endured, and is the majority of the body of their work that has
> survived, not just one or two hit singles.

But if Sheldon didn't say completely idiotic things, he wouldn't be
Sheldon.

--Bryan