Chefs & tatoos
On 21/12/2010 10:55 PM, Omelet wrote:
>
> Genital mutilation (circumcision) is not a natural process.
> It must be there for a reason or evolution would have taken care of it.
It is a flap of skin. It is not like the sexual mutilation of females
where they remove the clitoris and sew things up.
>> The most convincing argument for some men is it is pretty much a
>> non-issue for newborn infants, and so much less traumatic than having to
>> have one as an adult.
>
> If they are incapable of keeping it clean, then yes, it needs to be cut
> off. Pigs should not reproduce. Ick!
You should admit that some people have twisted views about touching the
genitals. You raise kids with sexual hang-ups and then expect that roll
back their foreskins to clean up at least once a day.
> But that should be a personal choice. Not enforced on an innocent and
> helpless child.
>
> Kinda like the issue of breast etc. cancer in women....
>
> and uterine or cervical cancer.
>
> Should all women have their breasts, cervix and ovaries removed due to
>
Hardly. They aren't removing the whole penis. They trim off a useless
piece of skin.
|