Thread: Chefs & tatoos
View Single Post
  #161 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Dave Smith[_1_] Dave Smith[_1_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35,884
Default Chefs & tatoos

On 21/12/2010 10:55 PM, Omelet wrote:
>
> Genital mutilation (circumcision) is not a natural process.
> It must be there for a reason or evolution would have taken care of it.


It is a flap of skin. It is not like the sexual mutilation of females
where they remove the clitoris and sew things up.


>> The most convincing argument for some men is it is pretty much a
>> non-issue for newborn infants, and so much less traumatic than having to
>> have one as an adult.

>
> If they are incapable of keeping it clean, then yes, it needs to be cut
> off. Pigs should not reproduce. Ick!


You should admit that some people have twisted views about touching the
genitals. You raise kids with sexual hang-ups and then expect that roll
back their foreskins to clean up at least once a day.

> But that should be a personal choice. Not enforced on an innocent and
> helpless child.
>
> Kinda like the issue of breast etc. cancer in women....
>
> and uterine or cervical cancer.
>
> Should all women have their breasts, cervix and ovaries removed due to
>



Hardly. They aren't removing the whole penis. They trim off a useless
piece of skin.